I have done hundreds of software demos at this point and this is by far the best way I have found. When I do a software demo I either eliminate slides entirely or do a really short slideshow (2 or 3 slides only) and then just jump into the software from there. To demo the features, just demo the features and let the software speak for itself. Really depends on the audience/situation, but generally I would say don’t worry about transitions and appearance and focus instead on the flow of your presentation. Note: you would be surprised at the fierce oposition in big companies against slides that contain anything less than the content of the entire presentation. I think your slides should be there only to show content that you cannot explain with words alone - if I can read everything I need from your slides, then why are you here? I would encourage you to be very careful with animations - you don't want your audience to lose focus because you took them on a Hollywood-like trip across the universe every three minutes (looking at you, Prezi). I've also used Powerpoint and Keynote, and other than Keynote having slightly prettier defaults I couldn't give a strong reason for choosing one over the other. Īs for the software itself: I use LibreOffice and that's fine - if it can generate presentations that would allow Steve Jobs to introduce the iPhone, it is good enough for me. A good place to start, IMHO, are the "Death by Powerpoint" guidelines. No software in the world will make your presentation interesting if you don't know how to make a good presentation. > Total noob here when it comes to making good presentations. But if you want your presentations to be interesting and engaging, don't go where everyone else is going. If you want your presentations to look like everyone else's, then sure - use keynote or whatever. Everyone is bored to death of Powerpoint and hand drawn stuff catches the eye. People get really engaged by hand drawn slides, and I always get good feedback on them. (But while I'm presenting I'll often add more lines while I explain something). Sometimes I do that live, and sometimes I prepare a bunch of drawings beforehand and flip through them. A demo is more interesting than a set of screenshots, even if the content itself is identical.Īnd as for diagrams and title slides and things, I like to draw them by hand on my ipad. If I want to show what the code does, I'll open the app or website and show it in its "live" context. They ask more questions about it, and you can explore other parts of the code than what is on screen. The audience feels differently about code in your IDE. I don't really understand why this is different from screenshotting the code and putting it in a slide, but it is. These days if I want to show you code, I'll open up my IDE and show it to you, right there in my code window. People fall asleep when you whip out a slide deck. Everything on a slide feels like dead content. I've moved away from this style of presentation. If you have developed one please don't hesitate to link here. Prefer indie tools which I can support (if they are good enough). Is Keynote good enough? Please let me know. Haven't explored Keynote enough except for some basic presentations. Nice motions/transitions (rules out Pitch who have been taking forever to implement it)Īpart from this, do you use any specific software to animate code blocks? I really like the Cypress documentation videos where certain parts of the code blocks are highlighted, with rest dimmed out, while explaining specific functions/methods (An example: ).Īny tools that you use to make your presentations stand out can also be included. Total noob here when it comes to making good presentations.ġ. In need of a software that will generate slick presentations for demoing product features (target market is software developers).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |